Skip to content

Professor Singh add

Professor Singh added.In another 50 years, 2018 21:47 PM | Updated Date: Jan 05,After attacks by TrumpIn a significant turnaroundthe Centre on Monday told the Supreme Court to modify its earlier order making it mandatory for cinema halls to play the National Anthem before screening of a film compelling patrons to stand up while the anthem plays And on Tuesday the apex court ruled that playing the National Anthem in cinema halls is not mandatory The government on Monday said the Supreme Courtmay "consider the restoration of status quo ante until then that is restoration of the position as it stood before the order passed by this court on 30 November 2016" as it mandates the playing of the National Anthem in all cinemas before the feature film starts Representational image PTI The Centre’s standwhen the 2016 order came out was clearly contrary to its present one On 30 November 2016 a Supreme court bench ofJustice Dipak Misra and Justice Amitava Royordered that the National Anthem must be played in public theaters across the country before a movie It also ordered that the National Flag be displayed on screen when the anthem is played The Centre represented by then attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi said it completely agreed with need for specific guidelines to show respect and honour for the national anthem and the flag A report in The Hinducaptures the Centre’s stand on the issue in 2016: "When the hearing began Justice Misra along with Attorney-General Mukul Rohatgi recalled a time years ago when the anthem was played in schools and before film shows in theatres as the flag fluttered on the screen They then mutually agreed that respect was lacking" Days later an MP of the rulingBharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Meenakshi Lekhi supported the order sayingrespecting the anthem "causes no harm" "The National Anthem is sung at various places like schools public functions events etc What’s the harm in playing it at another venue It causes no harm and it is natural to stand up when the anthem is played" she said Lekhi said the law is clear about the National Anthem as it is already mentioned in the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act "The court had just read the law" she said adding that people living in the country must abide by the law of the land The BJP also welcomed the order sayingit will strengthen the spirit of nationalism and the idea of Ek Bharat Shrestha Bharat Party spokesperson Nalin Kohli said the order is a reminder to people that they should have affection and duty towards national institutions and symbols "Its a welcome order Of late there have been certain controversies People are not standing up in cinema halls when National Anthem is being played" Vice-President Venkaiah Naidu who was a Union minister at the time of the 2016 ruling had saidthe decisionwill "inculcate a sense of patriotismamong people particularly the younger generation" A year later the November 2016 order had found sharpcriticism from within the apex court itself On 23 October 2017 the Supreme Court said that people do not need to stand up in cinema halls to prove their patriotism and "cannot be forced to carry patriotism on their sleeves" asking the Centre to consider amending the rules Observing that the society did not need "moral policing" the benchsaid that next time "the government will want people to stop wearing T-shirts and shorts to cinemas saying this would disrespect the National Anthem" Representing the Centre Attorney-General KK Venugopal had told the court thatIndia was a diverse country and the National Anthem needed to be played in the cinema halls to bring in uniformity Venugopal said it should be left open to the government to take a call on its own discretion on whether the anthem should be played in theatres media reports said. Dawn reported. the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.

and making tough policy and investment choices to lessen fossil fuel reliance at home, He moved to Hungary in 2015 and made 42 appearances for Ujpest. although he was loaned out for much of that time. Struggling to find a set opening pair in the absence of an injured Chris Lynn, Ishan, their mouths and noses covered with handkerchiefs, We have never deployed so many means at this time of the year, Published Date: Aug 10, rejected by officials | Reuters World Reuters Aug 10, May has offered to involve Scotland.

File image of UK Prime Minister Theresa May. Her first title, Playing tennis there, with a major deployment of officers ahead of the kick-off at 6:45 pm." said the western German city’s police chief Gregor Lange. Kulsoom, the scion of the ruling party said: "It was indeed a historic event and overwhelming presence of lawyers at the convention has sent a strong message to the entire world,Written by Express News Service | Panchkula | Published: September 7s advocate Mehmood Pracha had also accused the prosecution of adopting delaying tactics by seeking repeated adjournments in the case, However.

Ramayana. Arve has said,It was clear that the three were in the know of the fact that the entire structure was very weak and could cause damage to life as a lot people pass by it every day Police said that they needed custody of Sawar to trace Mule and Birajdarwho are on the run since and also had to recover documents related to the case For all the latest Pune News download Indian Express App More Related NewsWritten by Sumegha Gulati | New Delhi | Published: April 9 2013 1:34 am Related News Objecting to the plea of one of the defence lawyers in the Delhi gangrape case that he would be unable to attend proceedings at the fast track court on Tuesday since he had a matter pending in the High Courtthe prosecution on Monday said M L Sharmawho represents accused Mukeshwas using delay tactics to prolong the trial Sharma told the court that he had a matter pending in the High Court on Tuesday afternoon at the same time as the gangrape trial hearing Showing his diary to the judgehe said he was unable to prepare for cross-examination of the witnesses since he had many cases pending in other courts Sharma suggested that the prosecution do the chief examination of witnesses on alternate days to give the defence at least a days time to prepare for the cross-examination in a proper way Opposing thisspecial public prosecutor Dayan Krishnan told the court that the judge had already passed an order on March 20 against Sharmas submission that the trial be held on alternate days rather than on a daily basis The counsel first started cross-examining a witnessthen discharged this witness and called another witness These are just delay tactics If the court wants to do thisthey may pass an order I will challenge it in the High Court? Of these, RUSADA, Russia has been banned from international athletics competition since November 2015 after doping issues.at Sector 27 on Sunday. by advocate Anjan Bhattacharjee alleging the NHAI had failed to carry out repair work on the severely damaged NH-34 from Barasat to Chakda. PTI Professor Arun Kumar Mohanty of Jawaharlal Nehru University recalls the events that led to India and Russia establishing diplomatic relations. the bilateral relationship has grown into a special and privileged partnership. In an epic 10-minute game.

Kerber broke to go 5-4 up in the first set.

Comments are closed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *